|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Posts: 3,
Visits: 3
|
Hi!
I currently have a problem with the ProxyType parameter of ViewerX.
Whenever I'm trying to set a Proxy Type with password (VPT_SOCKS5_USRPWD or VPT_HTTP_BASIC) I get a ArgumentException "Value does not fall within the expected range.".
I'm using the latest version (2.9.6.1) and .NET 2.0.
All other proxy types seem to work, at least I don't get an exception when setting the property.
I've also tried setting the username & password properties before setting ProxyType but that doesn't help.
regards,
felix deimel
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Administrators
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 7:44 PM
Posts: 1,582,
Visits: 2,954
|
Hi Felix, I'll try to reproduce this problem first thing in the morning (10:35PM in Singapore now) and get back to you with my testing results.
 We are looking for investors and business partners. Please contact us for more details
Kindest Regards, SmartCode Solutions Support
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Posts: 3,
Visits: 3
|
thx!
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Administrators
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 7:44 PM
Posts: 1,582,
Visits: 2,954
|
Felix, the VPT_SOCKS5_USRPWD and VPT_HTTP_BASIC values are no longer used by ViewerX (they will be removed from the .IDL file in the next build). You should use VPT_SOCKS5 and VPT_HTTP instead. Upon connection ViewerX will automatically detect whether or not a remote proxy server require login credentials to authenticate, and will use ProxyUser and ProxyPassword value if required. I tested ViewerX with WinGate proxy server and it appears to work just fine. Please let me know if you need any additional assistance. PS: please note that in case of SOCKS5 (username/password) authentication the proxy server must be configured to accept "RFC1929 (Cleartext) authentication for SOCKS5" connections.
 We are looking for investors and business partners. Please contact us for more details
Kindest Regards, SmartCode Solutions Support
|
|
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Posts: 3,
Visits: 3
|
Oh, I see!
Thanks for the quick response.
|