﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>The VNC Manager - SmartCode Solutions Forum / SmartCode ViewerX VNC Viewer ActiveX / Bug Reports  / VNC ViewerX crashes?? / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>The VNC Manager - SmartCode Solutions Forum</description><link>http://www.s-code.com/forum/</link><webMaster>forums@s-code.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:07:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: VNC ViewerX crashes??</title><link>http://www.s-code.com/forum/Topic1303-8-1.aspx</link><description>Well.. it still crashes with ZLIB.. and I don't understand that you say ZLIB is less bandwidth consuming..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've tried to log the BytesReceived method and for me it seems that this number is increasing at a rate of about 20000 bytes pr. sec with ZLIB and about 190 bytes with ZRLE.. Is it possible to test it like this or is there a reason why this method cannot be used?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Erik</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:00:33 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>erix</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: VNC ViewerX crashes??</title><link>http://www.s-code.com/forum/Topic1303-8-1.aspx</link><description>ZLIB is the most effective encoding and recommended for WAN connections. ZRLE is less effective and recommended for LAN connections.</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:54:26 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Support (s-code)</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: VNC ViewerX crashes??</title><link>http://www.s-code.com/forum/Topic1303-8-1.aspx</link><description>I have to consider network performance also.. is ZLIB as low-bandwidth consuming as ZRLE ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Erik </description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:02:15 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>erix</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: VNC ViewerX crashes??</title><link>http://www.s-code.com/forum/Topic1303-8-1.aspx</link><description>Hi Erik,&lt;BR&gt;have you tried to use ZLIB encoding? If you haven't could you please give it a try. zlib is the most stable VNC encoding I'm pretty sure that you won't face such troubles as with zrle encoding.</description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:53:10 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Support (s-code)</dc:creator></item><item><title>VNC ViewerX crashes??</title><link>http://www.s-code.com/forum/Topic1303-8-1.aspx</link><description>Using ViewerX version 2.7.7.1 and a RealVNC server, the ViewerX component crashes the program. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems that the more data transferred the sooner the crash happens. Stretched or none stretched mode does not have any effect.. both modes crash after a while.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The application I'm using testing is the C# sample without modifications. (well I fixed the encoding to ZRLE)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The application running on the server PC which we need to monitor has a couple of GIF-animations running, which gives datarates of approximately 700 bytes/sec with ZRLE encoding. At this rate the crash happens at about 5-7 minutes. And a lot later if these GIF-animations are disabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried to add an button to the sample.. with which I call the Refresh - method.. This method actually still works and the Viewer is really updated. The communication also works.. The GetBytesReceived keeps reporting more bytes received even after the screen updating is stopped.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the Viewer stops updating.. I cannot move the application or minimize/maximize, i.e. anything that could trig a screen-update, will make the application crash immediately.. without any notice actually..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any Ideas??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I saw there was a similar post in VNC manager bug report.. But I'm not sure that this was really helpful..</description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:24:49 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>erix</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>